2018/19 Undergraduate Module Catalogue
PHIL2122 Formal Logic
20 creditsClass Size: 80
Taught: Semester 1 View Timetable
Year running 2018/19
Pre-requisite qualificationsPHIL 1250
|PHIL1250||How to Think Clearly and Argue Well|
This module is mutually exclusive with
|MATH2040||Mathematical Logic 1|
Module replacesPHIL2010 Formal Logic
This module is not approved as a discovery module
Module summaryThis module is only available as an discovery module for students studying on Linguistics, Mathematics and Computing modules with relevant prerequisites.Throughout the history of philosophy, philosophers have been keen to identify the principles of logic: those most general principles that we can always rely on not to take us wrong. In this course we examine the formal theories of logic in more detail than in PHIL 1800: Elementary Logic (which is a pre-requisite for this course). You will learn about rigorous methods for proving whether an argument is valid or invalid. You will learn how to reason formally about a formal system. You will learn about modern developments in non-classical logic. This module will be of use and interest to mathematicians and computer scientists. But it should also be of use and interest to anyone who is interested in how we can rigorously establish conclusions: the formal study of logic is not some abstract technical theory, but a tool for sharpening our own thinking. There is no area of study in which argument is not important, and therefore no area of study in which knowledge of logic cannot help.The module is taught through lectures and tutorials and assessed by a final exam.
ObjectivesOn completion of this module, students should be able to:
1. Formalize natural language arguments in first-order quantified logic.
2. Use a proof system (axiomatic, natural deduction, or truth trees) to complete derivations with formulas involving both connectives and quantifiers.
3. Demonstrate an understanding of model-theoretic notions like validity and invalidity, and be able to recognize a countermodel for invalid formulas and arguments.
4. Demonstrate an understanding of basic metatheoretical claims about first-order proof systems, like e.g. soundness and completeness.
1. Revision: translation into a formal system and truth tables.
2. Introduction of a proof system for propositional first-order logic.
3. Introduction of a proof system for quantified first-order logic.
4. Basic metatheory: statement of soundness and completeness theorems for first-order logic.
|Delivery type||Number||Length hours||Student hours|
|Private study hours||173.00|
|Total Contact hours||27.00|
|Total hours (100hr per 10 credits)||200.00|
Private study- Lecture preparation: 74 hours
- Tutorial preparation: 49 hours
- Exam preparation: 50 hours.
Opportunities for Formative FeedbackThere will be a mock exam paper distributed in eighth week for those who want one.
Methods of assessment
|Exam type||Exam duration||% of formal assessment|
|Standard exam (closed essays, MCQs etc)||3 hr 00 mins||100.00|
|Total percentage (Assessment Exams)||100.00|
Normally resits will be assessed by the same methodology as the first attempt, unless otherwise stated
Reading listThe reading list is available from the Library website
Last updated: 25/03/2019
Browse Other Catalogues
- Undergraduate module catalogue
- Taught Postgraduate module catalogue
- Undergraduate programme catalogue
- Taught Postgraduate programme catalogue
Errors, omissions, failed links etc should be notified to the Catalogue Team.PROD