This module is inactive in the selected year. The information shown below is for the academic year that the module was last running in, prior to the year selected.
2006/07 Undergraduate Module Catalogue
HPSC3140 Gender, Science and Technology
10 creditsClass Size: 100
In light of the effect of COVID-19 and lockdown restrictions on students' learning experiences, the School of PRHS have made the decision to modify assessment in Semester 2 modules in the 2020-21 academic year. Changes may involve reducing the number of assessment points (e.g. assessing one essay rather than two) or reducing word counts where it is possible to do so whilst protecting the integrity of the module's Learning Outcomes. Information on any changes to assessment is available to enrolled students in the Minerva module area, and can also be sought from the module leader or the PRHS SES team.
Taught: Semester 1 (Sep to Jan) View Timetable
Year running 2006/07
Pre-requisitesAt least 20 credits in level 2 HPSC modules or equivalent, subject to the approval of the Chair of the Division of History and Philosophy of Science
This module is approved as an Elective
Module summaryScientists and philosophers have long viewed science as being free of gender bias - or at least that it is normally so. But this view has been criticized over the last three decades. Why have comparatively few women succeeded in science as Marie Curie did? Why were women who made major contributors to Nobel-prizing science, such as Rosalind Franklin's in DNA research, almost completely forgotten? Feminists have suggested that answers to these questions lie in the gender structures of science ? that men's power in science has been greater than women, and thus that science has long been fundamentally 'masculine' in character. Feminist critics suggest even that the vocabulary, practices and concepts of science have been marked by common but questionable assumptions about differences in masculine and feminine roles - especially in biomedical studies of reproduction. By looking at the history of men's and women's changing roles in the sciences over the last few centuries this module presents an opportunity to subject these claims to critical examination. One particular focus is the married lives of scientists, especially the Curies and Einsteins, to examine how far the creativity often attributed to men might be the result of collaboration with spouses.
ObjectivesOn completion of this module students will be able to: critically evaluate scientific theories of sex and gender; critically evaluate the use of gendered images and analogies in scientific literature; comment on the interaction between gender and politics in the applications of science; explain, place in their philosophical context and evaluate feminist epistomologies
The syllabus includes topics chosen from the following list: theories of sex difference in the biomedical sciences; presuppositions about gender and their relationship to sociobiological theory; the impact of science on women's lives; the use of gendered images and analogies in the presentation of science; the relationship between gender and politics in the application of science; science as knowledge and the place of specifically feminist epistemologies as contrasted with traditional philosophical accounts of knowledge; the role of women as practitioners of science.
Due to COVID-19, teaching and assessment activities are being kept under review - see module enrolment pages for informationSeminars 11 x 2 hours
Methods of assessment
Due to COVID-19, teaching and assessment activities are being kept under review - see module enrolment pages for information1 x 2000- word essay.
Reading listThe reading list is available from the Library website
Last updated: 08/07/2008
Browse Other Catalogues
- Undergraduate module catalogue
- Taught Postgraduate module catalogue
- Undergraduate programme catalogue
- Taught Postgraduate programme catalogue
Errors, omissions, failed links etc should be notified to the Catalogue Team.PROD